WEKO3
アイテム
なぜ人はモンティ・ホール・ジレンマで選択を変えないのか? ―3 枚カード問題と6 枚カード問題を用いて―
https://doi.org/10.57426/00001389
https://doi.org/10.57426/0000138974020bcc-4247-4ec3-ac6a-d3e9424ad4b3
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
HSv21-p79-87.pdf (714.0 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-05-25 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | なぜ人はモンティ・ホール・ジレンマで選択を変えないのか? ―3 枚カード問題と6 枚カード問題を用いて― | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | Why Won’t People Switch Their Choice in the Monty Hall Dilemma? : Experiments Using Three-Cards Problem and Six-Cards Problem | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | Monty Hall Dilemma | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | Two-stage decision making | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | Trait-anxiety | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.57426/00001389 | |||||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
山本, 雅代
× 山本, 雅代
× Yamamoto, Masayo
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | This problem, Two-stage Decision Making is well known as Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD). Not only most people try to solve the vague problems intuitively, but they scarcely can switch the result brought by their intuition. If they are given feedback, which is “better to switch”, how much feedback would they need to master and notice their mistakes, then could they change their first selection? If they are shown the different number of doors, would it affect them in their decision making? And dose their anxiety peculiarity correlate their switching action toward their first selection? To examine these questions, I carried out PC test on MHD(3cards problem・6cards problem). For the particularization of the anxiety peculiarity of the examinees, I carried out A-trait of Inventory State Trait Anxiety , after done PC test. Totally 50 under graduates (M: 28, F: 22) participated in the examination. I made three-way factorial mixed analysis of variance as a token of the independent variable which is 2(3cards・6cards)×2(the low・the high in the anxiety)× 5(block). I repeated the analyses 60 times to check whether they switched or stuck at the time of their second opportunity. I divided the total 60 analyses into 5 blocks. I settled the dependent variable as the average of the number of switching in each block. Consequently, what all the examinations proved to us is that High anxiety group arrives at the correct solutions faster than Low anxiety group. Because the more often High anxiety group changes their selections, the more positive feedback brings them the correct solutions. |
|||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
仁愛大学研究紀要. 人間学部篇 en : Research journal of Jin-Ai University, Faculty of Human Studies 号 21, p. 79-87, 発行日 2023-02-20 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 仁愛大学 | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 21853355 | |||||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||||
